Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FX75
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
94 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced March 2015
- Replaced the Olympus SH-1
- Successor is Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Released June 2010
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FX70
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus SH-2 versus Panasonic FX75, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the SH-2 (16MP) and the FX75 (14MP) is pretty similar and they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe SH-2 was brought out 4 years later than the FX75 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the SH-2 scores versus the FX75 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus SH-2 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The entire galleries are available at Olympus SH-2 Gallery & Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Panasonic FX75
SH-2 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | March 2015 | June 2010 | Fresher by 59 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus SH-2
FX75 | SH-2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-2 and Panasonic FX75
SH-2 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | No manual focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus SH-2 has got outer dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) while the Panasonic FX75 has proportions of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Check out the Olympus SH-2 versus Panasonic FX75 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at that moment. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the SH-2 against the FX75.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the SH-2 and FX75 is 88 and 94 respectively.
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing simply by going over a spec sheet. The graphic underneath may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the SH-2 and FX75.
Clearly, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You can expect the Olympus SH-2 to offer you more detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The fresher SH-2 provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2015-03-11 | 2010-06-01 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.2-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 11.5 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 7.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 271 grams (0.60 lbs) | 165 grams (0.36 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $399 | $139 |