Olympus SH-2 vs Pentax Q-S1
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac7d4/ac7d4b646d82f72e1235bc9a541f3ccc1d146b3c" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-2 front Olympus Stylus SH-2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd627/dd6277e99ef9f564cea30d5ecbfa8cecd5214610" alt="Pentax Q-S1 front Pentax Q-S1 front"
92 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
Olympus SH-2 vs Pentax Q-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced March 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus SH-1
- Successor is Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
- Launched August 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus SH-2 vs Pentax Q-S1 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Olympus SH-2 vs Pentax Q-S1, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the SH-2 (16MP) and Q-S1 (12MP) and the SH-2 (1/2.3") and Q-S1 (1/1.7") come with totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The SH-2 was brought out 8 months later than the Q-S1 so they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus SH-2 being a Compact camera and the Pentax Q-S1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the SH-2 grades versus the Q-S1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus SH-2 vs Pentax Q-S1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus SH-2 and Pentax Q-S1. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus SH-2 Gallery and Pentax Q-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Pentax Q-S1
SH-2 | Q-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | March 2015 | ![]() | August 2014 | Fresher by 8 months |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax Q-S1 over the Olympus SH-2
Q-S1 | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus SH-2 and Pentax Q-S1
SH-2 | Q-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen size |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus SH-2 vs Pentax Q-S1 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus SH-2 provides physical dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Pentax Q-S1 has sizing of 105mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus SH-2 vs Pentax Q-S1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the SH-2 against the Q-S1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60284/60284db7a6d66162e24876a8a79f5412fea1a323" alt="Olympus SH-2 vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison Olympus SH-2 vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the SH-2 and Q-S1 is 88 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c056/2c056300131e8eb6476bc5217125599ccecee0a1" alt="Olympus SH-2 vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison Olympus SH-2 vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SH-2 vs Pentax Q-S1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to envision the gap in sensor sizing just by viewing specs. The visual here might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SH-2 and Q-S1.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The SH-2 featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF more challenging and the Olympus SH-2 will provide you with greater detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The newer SH-2 will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45540/455405b21ee8b641290c055f2781f03baeb00d58" alt="Olympus SH-2 vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison Olympus SH-2 vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SH-2 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfeaf/bfeaf7d50e13af1d35a45483274490f332d4106b" alt="Olympus SH-2 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SH-2 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus SH-2 vs Pentax Q-S1 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Pentax Q-S1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Pentax Q-S1 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2015-03-11 | 2014-08-04 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | Q Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax Q |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 8 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 11.5fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 4.90 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 271 grams (0.60 pounds) | 203 grams (0.45 pounds) |
Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 photos | 250 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-92B | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $399 | $250 |