Olympus SH-2 vs Sony QX1
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
90 Imaging
62 Features
48 Overall
56
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony QX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed March 2015
- Replaced the Olympus SH-1
- Later Model is Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
- Introduced September 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus SH-2 vs Sony QX1 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus SH-2 and Sony QX1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Lens-style by competitors Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the SH-2 (16MP) and the QX1 (20MP) is fairly close but the SH-2 (1/2.3") and QX1 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe SH-2 was released 7 months after the QX1 and they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus SH-2 being a Compact camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the SH-2 scores vs the QX1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus SH-2 vs Sony QX1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus SH-2 & Sony Alpha QX1. The complete galleries are available at Olympus SH-2 Gallery & Sony QX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Sony QX1
| SH-2 | QX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2015 | September 2014 | More modern by 7 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | " | Larger display (+3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 0k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Olympus SH-2
| QX1 | SH-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus SH-2 and Sony QX1
| SH-2 | QX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus SH-2 offers outside dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) while the Sony QX1 has measurements of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus SH-2 and Sony QX1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the SH-2 against the QX1.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the SH-2 and QX1 is 88 and 90 respectively.
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes merely by viewing specs. The picture here may give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SH-2 and QX1.
All in all, both the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The SH-2 because of its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony QX1 will render more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The younger SH-2 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony QX1 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Sony Alpha QX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Sony Alpha QX1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Lens-style |
| Revealed | 2015-03-11 | 2014-09-03 |
| Body design | Compact | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.2 x 15.4mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 357.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5456 x 3632 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 16000 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | - |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 0k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 11.5fps | 4.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 4.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 271 gr (0.60 lbs) | 216 gr (0.48 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photos | 440 photos |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $399 | $500 |