Olympus SH-2 vs Sony QX1
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
90 Imaging
62 Features
48 Overall
56
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony QX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed March 2015
- Replaced the Olympus SH-1
- Later Model is Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
- Introduced September 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus SH-2 vs Sony QX1 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus SH-2 and Sony QX1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Lens-style by competitors Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the SH-2 (16MP) and the QX1 (20MP) is fairly close but the SH-2 (1/2.3") and QX1 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SH-2 was released 7 months after the QX1 and they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus SH-2 being a Compact camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the SH-2 scores vs the QX1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SH-2 vs Sony QX1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus SH-2 & Sony Alpha QX1. The complete galleries are available at Olympus SH-2 Gallery & Sony QX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Sony QX1
| SH-2 | QX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2015 | September 2014 | More modern by 7 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | " | Larger display (+3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 0k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Olympus SH-2
| QX1 | SH-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus SH-2 and Sony QX1
| SH-2 | QX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus SH-2 offers outside dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) while the Sony QX1 has measurements of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus SH-2 and Sony QX1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the SH-2 against the QX1.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the SH-2 and QX1 is 88 and 90 respectively.
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes merely by viewing specs. The picture here may give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SH-2 and QX1.
All in all, both the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The SH-2 because of its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony QX1 will render more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The younger SH-2 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony QX1 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Sony Alpha QX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Sony Alpha QX1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Lens-style |
| Revealed | 2015-03-11 | 2014-09-03 |
| Body design | Compact | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.2 x 15.4mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 357.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5456 x 3632 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 16000 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | - |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 0k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 11.5fps | 4.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 4.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 271 gr (0.60 lbs) | 216 gr (0.48 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photos | 440 photos |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $399 | $500 |