Olympus SH-2 vs Sony WX9
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
99 Imaging
38 Features
37 Overall
37
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony WX9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced March 2015
- Older Model is Olympus SH-1
- New Model is Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
- n/ag - 95 x 56 x 20mm
- Launched January 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus SH-2 vs Sony WX9 Overview
In this write-up, we are evaluating the Olympus SH-2 versus Sony WX9, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the SH-2 (16MP) and the WX9 (16MP) is fairly similar and they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SH-2 was brought out 4 years after the WX9 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus SH-2 being a Compact camera and the Sony WX9 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief overview of how the SH-2 scores against the WX9 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus SH-2 vs Sony WX9 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus SH-2 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX9. The entire galleries are available at Olympus SH-2 Gallery & Sony WX9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Sony WX9
| SH-2 | WX9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2015 | January 2011 | More modern by 51 months | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony WX9 over the Olympus SH-2
| WX9 | SH-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 921k | 460k | Crisper display (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SH-2 and Sony WX9
| SH-2 | WX9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony WX9 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus SH-2 comes with outer measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Sony WX9 has specifications of 95mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Compare the Olympus SH-2 versus Sony WX9 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the SH-2 and the WX9.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the SH-2 and WX9 is 88 and 99 respectively.
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony WX9 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to picture the gap between sensor sizes simply by reading a spec sheet. The pic below might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the SH-2 and WX9.
Clearly, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same megapixels and you can expect similar quality of files however you should really take the launch date of the products into consideration. The newer SH-2 should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony WX9 Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony WX9 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX9 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX9 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2015-03-11 | 2011-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.6-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | XtraFine LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 11.5 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 5.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 271g (0.60 lbs) | - |
| Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 95 x 56 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $399 | $188 |