Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released February 2016
- Superseded the Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Released June 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Olympus SH-3 and Olympus TG-2 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof and both are sold by Olympus. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the SH-3 (16MP) and TG-2 iHS (12MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe SH-3 was announced 2 years later than the TG-2 iHS and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise view of how the SH-3 matches up vs the TG-2 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus SH-3 and Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The whole galleries are available at Olympus SH-3 Gallery and Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| SH-3 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2016 |  | June 2013 | Fresher by 32 months |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus SH-3
| TG-2 iHS | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+150k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| SH-3 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SH-3 has got exterior measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-2 iHS has dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SH-3 and Olympus TG-2 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the SH-3 versus the TG-2 iHS.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the SH-3 and TG-2 iHS is 88 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing purely by going over specs. The visual here should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the SH-3 and TG-2 iHS.
As you can plainly see, both cameras feature the identical sensor size but different resolution. You should anticipate the Olympus SH-3 to offer you greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The fresher SH-3 provides an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2016-02-08 | 2013-06-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 610k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 11.5fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 271 grams (0.60 lbs) | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 shots | 350 shots |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $579 | $380 |
