Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus VR-320
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced February 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- New Model is Olympus VR-330
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras and both of them are created by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the SH-3 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SH-3 was revealed 4 years after the VR-320 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the SH-3 grades vs the VR-320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus SH-3 & Olympus VR-320. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus SH-3 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Olympus VR-320
| SH-3 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2016 | July 2011 | More modern by 56 months | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus SH-3
| VR-320 | SH-3 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Olympus VR-320
| SH-3 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus SH-3 features external dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus VR-320 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the SH-3 against the VR-320.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SH-3 and VR-320 is 88 and 94 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to envision the gap in sensor sizes merely by seeing technical specs. The image below may give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the SH-3 and VR-320.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Olympus SH-3 to provide more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The younger SH-3 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus SH-3 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2016-02-08 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 11.5 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 271 grams (0.60 lb) | 158 grams (0.35 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photographs | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $579 | $179 |