Clicky

Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic ZS200

Portability
88
Imaging
41
Features
51
Overall
45
Olympus Stylus SH-3 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 front
Portability
86
Imaging
54
Features
66
Overall
58

Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs

Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
  • Announced February 2016
  • Replaced the Olympus SH-2
Panasonic ZS200
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
  • 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
  • Introduced February 2018
  • Also referred to as Lumix DC-TZ200
  • Old Model is Panasonic ZS100
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview

On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus SH-3 and Panasonic ZS200, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the SH-3 (16MP) and the ZS200 (20MP) is pretty well matched but the SH-3 (1/2.3") and ZS200 (1") posses totally different sensor size.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The SH-3 was brought out 24 months earlier than the ZS200 which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the SH-3 matches up vs the ZS200 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Panasonic ZS200

 SH-3 ZS200 

Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus SH-3

 ZS200 SH-3 
IntroducedFebruary 2018February 2016More modern by 24 months
Manually focus More precise focusing
Screen resolution1240k460kSharper screen (+780k dot)

Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Panasonic ZS200

 SH-3 ZS200 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen size
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SH-3 has exterior dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS200 has dimensions of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).

Look at the Olympus SH-3 and Panasonic ZS200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is a front view scale comparison of the SH-3 against the ZS200.

Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the SH-3 and ZS200 is 88 and 86 respectively.

Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes purely by checking technical specs. The image below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the SH-3 and ZS200.

As you have seen, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The SH-3 due to its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field trickier and the Panasonic ZS200 will give you extra detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged SH-3 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 sensor size comparison

Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus SH-3 Portrait photography details
Panasonic ZS200 Portrait photography details
44
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
supports face detection autofocus
supports RAW formats
no manual focus
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
65
you can focus manually
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (1")
offers face detection focusing
delivers RAW files
external flash not possible
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus SH-3 Street photography info
Panasonic ZS200 Street photography info
70
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
boasts touch focus
lighter than competitors (271g)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
77
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is good (1")
delivers RAW files
has touch to focus
fixed screen
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus SH-3 Sports photography info
Panasonic ZS200 Sports photography info
51
great zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
good battery pack (380 shots)
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
70
excellent zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
silent mode (1/16,000s)
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
sensor size is good (1")
offers tracking autofocus
better than average battery life (370 shots)
has no phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus SH-3
Travel photography with Panasonic ZS200
74
good battery pack (380 CIPA)
lighter than competitors (271 grams)
boasts touch focus
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (25mm)
very long reach (600mm)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.0)
76
better than average battery life (370 per charge)
has bluetooth
has touch to focus
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
great zoom (360mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus SH-3
Landscape photography with Panasonic ZS200
55
really wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
supports RAW formats
good battery pack (380 per charge)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
70
you can focus manually
pretty wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (1")
delivers RAW files
better than average battery life (370 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus SH-3 Vlogging details
Panasonic ZS200 Vlogging details
35
really wide (25mm)
built-in touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection autofocus
video res high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
lighter than competitors (271g)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of external mic socket
35
pretty wide (24mm)
touchscreen functionality
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focusing
video res high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external mic socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus SH-3 and Panasonic ZS200
 Olympus Stylus SH-3Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200
General Information
Brand Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus Stylus SH-3 Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200
Also Known as - Lumix DC-TZ200
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Large Sensor Compact
Announced 2016-02-08 2018-02-13
Physical type Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VII Venus Engine
Sensor type BSI-CMOS MOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 5472 x 3648
Maximum native ISO 6400 12800
Maximum enhanced ISO - 25600
Minimum native ISO 125 125
RAW format
Minimum enhanced ISO - 80
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 49
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-600mm (24.0x) 24-360mm (15.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.0-6.9 f/3.3-6.4
Macro focus distance 3cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 2.7
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Screen resolution 460k dots 1,240k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,330k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.53x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30s 60s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Fastest silent shutter speed - 1/16000s
Continuous shutter rate 11.5 frames per second 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) 6.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 3840x2160 3840x2160
Video data format H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) Yes
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 271 gr (0.60 pounds) 340 gr (0.75 pounds)
Physical dimensions 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 380 shots 370 shots
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LI-92B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible)
Card slots One One
Launch cost $579 $800