Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FS42
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released February 2016
- Replaced the Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Push to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Introduced April 2009
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Olympus SH-3 versus Panasonic FS42, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the SH-3 (16MP) and FS42 (10MP) and the SH-3 (1/2.3") and FS42 (1/2.5") have different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SH-3 was announced 6 years after the FS42 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summary of how the SH-3 grades versus the FS42 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus SH-3 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus SH-3 Gallery & Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Panasonic FS42
SH-3 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2016 | April 2009 | More modern by 83 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus SH-3
FS42 | SH-3 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Panasonic FS42
SH-3 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus SH-3 has got external measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Panasonic FS42 has sizing of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus SH-3 versus Panasonic FS42 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the SH-3 vs the FS42.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the SH-3 and FS42 is 88 and 95 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to picture the difference in sensor sizes merely by researching specs. The image here may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the SH-3 and FS42.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The SH-3 having a bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus SH-3 will result in extra detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more recent SH-3 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Released | 2016-02-08 | 2009-04-17 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1000 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 11.5 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 6.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 271 gr (0.60 lb) | 132 gr (0.29 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $579 | $580 |