Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ1000
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
55 Imaging
51 Features
80 Overall
62
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed February 2016
- Superseded the Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 831g - 137 x 99 x 131mm
- Released June 2014
- Replacement is Panasonic FZ2500
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus SH-3 and Panasonic FZ1000, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the SH-3 (16MP) and the FZ1000 (20MP) is relatively close but the SH-3 (1/2.3") and FZ1000 (1") feature totally different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SH-3 was revealed 21 months after the FZ1000 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the SH-3 scores versus the FZ1000 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus SH-3 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus SH-3 Gallery and Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Panasonic FZ1000
SH-3 | FZ1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2016 | June 2014 | More modern by 21 months | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 over the Olympus SH-3
FZ1000 | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 460k | Sharper screen (+461k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Panasonic FZ1000
SH-3 | FZ1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus SH-3 enjoys physical measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ1000 has measurements of 137mm x 99mm x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") along with a weight of 831 grams (1.83 lbs).
Check out the Olympus SH-3 and Panasonic FZ1000 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the SH-3 versus the FZ1000.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the SH-3 and FZ1000 is 88 and 55 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to see the difference in sensor sizes simply by looking through specs. The image below may give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the SH-3 and FZ1000.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The SH-3 having a smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh harder and the Panasonic FZ1000 will provide you with more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The younger SH-3 is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SH-3 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2016-02-08 | 2014-06-12 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 25-400mm (16.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.8-4.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 11.5 frames per sec | 12.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 13.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 271 grams (0.60 lbs) | 831 grams (1.83 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 137 x 99 x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 517 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 pictures | 360 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-92B | DMW-BLC12PP |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | - |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $579 | $800 |