Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax Q7
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba681/ba6812b6e5df39af8b55dc812608daf65a0563e5" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-3 front Olympus Stylus SH-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff182/ff18240782b3e81fef5b6699b11da2b99c864ba8" alt="Pentax Q7 front Pentax Q7 front"
92 Imaging
37 Features
54 Overall
43
Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax Q7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released February 2016
- Older Model is Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 200g - 102 x 58 x 34mm
- Revealed August 2013
- Replaced the Pentax Q10
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax Q7 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax Q7, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the SH-3 (16MP) and Q7 (12MP) and the SH-3 (1/2.3") and Q7 (1/1.7") have totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The SH-3 was released 2 years after the Q7 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera and the Pentax Q7 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summary of how the SH-3 matches up vs the Q7 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax Q7 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus SH-3 and Pentax Q7. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus SH-3 Gallery and Pentax Q7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Pentax Q7
SH-3 | Q7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2016 | ![]() | August 2013 | Newer by 31 months |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax Q7 over the Olympus SH-3
Q7 | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Pentax Q7
SH-3 | Q7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax Q7 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera often, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus SH-3 provides exterior measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Pentax Q7 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs).
See the Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax Q7 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the SH-3 versus the Q7.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc1f5/cc1f573c0fbb098dffcd4e819ab2e687d55aa18b" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax Q7 size comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax Q7 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the SH-3 and Q7 is 88 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b00b/3b00b59288259f063e1e7f59344f6987c30fa3d4" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax Q7 top view buttons comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax Q7 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax Q7 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by going over specifications. The pic below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the SH-3 and Q7.
Plainly, each of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The SH-3 due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Olympus SH-3 will offer you more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The younger SH-3 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/baba3/baba36569a4134a05d6508b89f372ccd7e4c062d" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax Q7 sensor size comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax Q7 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax Q7 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13310/13310a711bc2acb9ada6657c4511f69b95b9aeb6" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax Q7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax Q7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax Q7 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Pentax Q7 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Pentax Q7 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2016-02-08 | 2013-08-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax Q |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 8 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD monitor, wide angle viewing, AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 11.5fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 4.90 m (ISO100/m) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | P-TTL, Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Trailing Curtain Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/2000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | FullHD(1920x1080, 30fps/25fps/24fps), HD(1280x720,16:9,30fps/25fps/24fps), VGA(640x480,4:3,30fps/25fps/24fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 271g (0.60 lb) | 200g (0.44 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 102 x 58 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 images | 250 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-92B | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (12 sec, 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD, SDHC, SDXC and Eye-Fi Card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $579 | $480 |