Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax WG-10
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
93 Imaging
37 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax WG-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced February 2016
- Superseded the Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Released June 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax WG-10 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus SH-3 and Pentax WG-10, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the SH-3 (16MP) and the WG-10 (14MP) is very similar and both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe SH-3 was introduced 2 years after the WG-10 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the SH-3 grades vs the WG-10 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax WG-10 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus SH-3 & Pentax WG-10. The whole galleries are available at Olympus SH-3 Gallery & Pentax WG-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Pentax WG-10
| SH-3 | WG-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2016 | June 2013 | Newer by 33 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-10 over the Olympus SH-3
| WG-10 | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Pentax WG-10
| SH-3 | WG-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax WG-10 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus SH-3 features exterior measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Pentax WG-10 has specifications of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the Olympus SH-3 and Pentax WG-10 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the SH-3 and the WG-10.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the SH-3 and WG-10 is 88 and 93 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax WG-10 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions simply by going over a spec sheet. The pic here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SH-3 and WG-10.
Clearly, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus SH-3 to deliver more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos more aggressively. The fresher SH-3 should have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax WG-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus SH-3 vs Pentax WG-10 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Pentax WG-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Pentax WG-10 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2016-02-08 | 2013-06-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 11.5 frames per sec | 0.7 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 1.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 271g (0.60 lb) | 167g (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 pictures | 260 pictures |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $579 | $0 |