Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh PX
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
95 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh PX Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced February 2016
- Superseded the Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Revealed August 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh PX Overview
Below is a comprehensive review of the Olympus SH-3 and Ricoh PX, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the SH-3 (16MP) and the PX (16MP) is fairly similar and both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SH-3 was launched 4 years later than the PX and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the SH-3 matches up against the PX in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh PX Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus SH-3 & Ricoh PX. The complete galleries are available at Olympus SH-3 Gallery & Ricoh PX Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Ricoh PX
| SH-3 | PX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2016 | August 2011 | More recent by 55 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Olympus SH-3
| PX | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Ricoh PX
| SH-3 | PX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh PX Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus SH-3 enjoys outside dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Ricoh PX has proportions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SH-3 and Ricoh PX in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the SH-3 and the PX.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SH-3 and PX is 88 and 95 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh PX Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to picture the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reading specifications. The photograph here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SH-3 and PX.
To sum up, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same resolution so you can expect similar quality of files though you will want to factor the age of the products into consideration. The fresher SH-3 provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh PX Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh PX Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Ricoh PX | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Ricoh PX |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2016-02-08 | 2011-08-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3072 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.9-5.4 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 11.5 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 271 gr (0.60 lb) | 156 gr (0.34 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $579 | $329 |