Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-30
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced February 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed October 2014
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-30, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the SH-3 (16MP) and the WG-30 (16MP) is relatively well matched and they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SH-3 was launched 17 months after the WG-30 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise summary of how the SH-3 matches up against the WG-30 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus SH-3 & Ricoh WG-30. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus SH-3 Gallery & Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Ricoh WG-30
| SH-3 | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2016 | October 2014 | More modern by 17 months | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Olympus SH-3
| WG-30 | SH-3 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Ricoh WG-30
| SH-3 | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | No manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus SH-3 provides physical dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-30 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Look at the Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-30 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at the time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the SH-3 versus the WG-30.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SH-3 and WG-30 is 88 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizes only by checking specs. The image below will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the SH-3 and WG-30.
All in all, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same MP so you can expect similar quality of photos though you might want to consider the launch date of the products into consideration. The more recent SH-3 will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus SH-3 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Ricoh WG-30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Ricoh WG-30 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2016-02-08 | 2014-10-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 11.5 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 271g (0.60 lb) | 192g (0.42 lb) |
| Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 pictures | 300 pictures |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $579 | $428 |