Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung HZ35W
Portability
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Portability
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced February 2016
- Replaced the Olympus SH-2
Samsung HZ35W
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced June 2010
- Alternative Name is WB650
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung HZ35W, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the SH-3 (16MP) and HZ35W (12MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe SH-3 was introduced 5 years later than the HZ35W and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the SH-3 scores against the HZ35W with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus SH-3 & Samsung HZ35W. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus SH-3 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Samsung HZ35W
| SH-3 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2016 |  | June 2010 | Fresher by 69 months |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus SH-3
| HZ35W | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Samsung HZ35W
| SH-3 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SH-3 has got exterior dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung HZ35W in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the SH-3 and the HZ35W.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the SH-3 and HZ35W is 88 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing only by looking through specifications. The photograph underneath may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SH-3 and HZ35W.
To sum up, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can expect the Olympus SH-3 to result in extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The more recent SH-3 provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus SH-3 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung HZ35W as a Portrait photography camera
decent MP (16 megapixels)
comes with face detect focus
saves RAW formats
focusing manually not possible
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has manual focus
offers face detection autofocus
external flash not possible
MP count low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Olympus SH-3 as a Street photography camera
Samsung HZ35W as a Street photography camera
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
has touch focus
lighter than competition in class (271 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others in class (245 grams)
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Olympus SH-3 Sports photography advice
Samsung HZ35W Sports photography advice
incredible zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16MP)
comes with tracking focus
better than average battery (380 per charge)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
great zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
offers tracking autofocus
MP count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Olympus SH-3 Travel photography advice
Samsung HZ35W Travel photography advice
better than average battery (380 CIPA)
lighter than competition in class (271 grams)
has touch focus
decent MP (16MP)
built-in flash
really wide (25mm)
very long reach (600mm)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
lighter than others in class (245g)
has built in flash
really wide (24mm)
great reach (360mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
MP count low (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Olympus SH-3 Landscape photography features
Samsung HZ35W Landscape photography features
really wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16MP)
saves RAW formats
better than average battery (380 CIPA)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has manual focus
really wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Olympus SH-3 Vlogging info
Samsung HZ35W Vlogging info
really wide (25mm)
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect focus
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
lighter than competition in class (271g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
missing mic socket
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection autofocus
lighter than others in class (245g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external mic socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Otherwise known as | - | WB650 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2016-02-08 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 11.5 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 271 gr (0.60 lbs) | 245 gr (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $579 | $300 |