Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung ST150F
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba681/ba6812b6e5df39af8b55dc812608daf65a0563e5" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-3 front Olympus Stylus SH-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2b34/d2b34be0402f7c9fe3c7c9ed4462bc8843f628b6" alt="Samsung ST150F front Samsung ST150F front"
96 Imaging
39 Features
30 Overall
35
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung ST150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced February 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 114g - 94 x 58 x 18mm
- Launched January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung ST150F Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Olympus SH-3 versus Samsung ST150F, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the SH-3 (16MP) and the ST150F (16MP) is pretty comparable and they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The SH-3 was introduced 3 years after the ST150F which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a more detailed comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the SH-3 matches up against the ST150F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung ST150F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus SH-3 and Samsung ST150F. The whole galleries are available at Olympus SH-3 Gallery and Samsung ST150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Samsung ST150F
SH-3 | ST150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2016 | ![]() | January 2013 | More modern by 38 months |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST150F over the Olympus SH-3
ST150F | SH-3 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Samsung ST150F
SH-3 | ST150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung ST150F Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus SH-3 enjoys outer measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST150F has proportions of 94mm x 58mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 114 grams (0.25 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SH-3 versus Samsung ST150F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the SH-3 against the ST150F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27c4/f27c4d218869752f41a853be389c1702bb441405" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung ST150F size comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung ST150F size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SH-3 and ST150F is 88 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88304/88304cc0dc207ad3a8b5789fd2b397b23900df16" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung ST150F top view buttons comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung ST150F top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung ST150F Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizes only by seeing specs. The image underneath will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SH-3 and ST150F.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same MP and you should expect comparable quality of photos but you might want to factor the release date of the cameras into account. The more modern SH-3 will have a benefit in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffa3a/ffa3ada6f3a0bda87c9ca7733f8e1a84c31146c5" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung ST150F sensor size comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung ST150F sensor size comparison"
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung ST150F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63d92/63d929ea30ca1921d94e7c23b0a28b6801ff1f20" alt="Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung ST150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung ST150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung ST150F Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Samsung ST150F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Samsung ST150F |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2016-02-08 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.5-6.3 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 1s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 11.5fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | - |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 271 grams (0.60 lb) | 114 grams (0.25 lb) |
Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 94 x 58 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $579 | $300 |