Olympus SH-3 vs Sony HX300
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
63 Imaging
44 Features
51 Overall
46
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched February 2016
- Superseded the Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Announced February 2013
- Older Model is Sony HX200V
- Replacement is Sony HX400V
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony HX300 Overview
Here is a thorough overview of the Olympus SH-3 and Sony HX300, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the SH-3 (16MP) and the HX300 (20MP) is pretty similar and they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SH-3 was announced 3 years later than the HX300 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short overview of how the SH-3 matches up vs the HX300 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony HX300 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus SH-3 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus SH-3 Gallery & Sony HX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Sony HX300
SH-3 | HX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2016 | February 2013 | Fresher by 37 months | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Olympus SH-3
HX300 | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 460k | Sharper screen (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Sony HX300
SH-3 | HX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus SH-3 comes with external dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Sony HX300 has proportions of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).
Check out the Olympus SH-3 and Sony HX300 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that moment. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the SH-3 against the HX300.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the SH-3 and HX300 is 88 and 63 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading specifications. The graphic below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SH-3 and HX300.
Plainly, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Sony HX300 to offer more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots much more aggressively. The more recent SH-3 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony HX300 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2016-02-08 | 2013-02-20 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 11.5 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | - |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 271g (0.60 lbs) | 623g (1.37 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $579 | $339 |