Olympus SP-100 vs Olympus Tough-3000
63 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Olympus SP-100 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 594g - 122 x 91 x 133mm
- Revealed January 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Released January 2010
- Also referred to as mju Tough 3000
Olympus SP-100 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus SP-100 vs Olympus Tough-3000, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof and both of them are created by Olympus. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the SP-100 (16MP) and Tough-3000 (12MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SP-100 was launched 4 years after the Tough-3000 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus SP-100 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the SP-100 grades versus the Tough-3000 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus SP-100 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus SP-100 & Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus SP-100 Gallery & Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-100 over the Olympus Tough-3000
SP-100 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2014 | January 2010 | More modern by 50 months | |
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus SP-100
Tough-3000 | SP-100 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus SP-100 and Olympus Tough-3000
SP-100 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus SP-100 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus SP-100 has outer measurements of 122mm x 91mm x 133mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 5.2") along with a weight of 594 grams (1.31 lbs) and the Olympus Tough-3000 has proportions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus SP-100 vs Olympus Tough-3000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the SP-100 versus the Tough-3000.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SP-100 and Tough-3000 is 63 and 94 respectively.
Olympus SP-100 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to picture the difference in sensor sizes purely by going through a spec sheet. The picture here might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SP-100 and Tough-3000.
Clearly, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus SP-100 to provide more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images way more aggressively. The fresher SP-100 should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus SP-100 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SP-100 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SP-100 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus Stylus SP-100 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
Otherwise known as | - | mju Tough 3000 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2014-01-29 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 125 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 2cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 920k dots | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1700s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 7.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Fill-in, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Optional | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 594 gr (1.31 lbs) | 159 gr (0.35 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 91 x 133mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 5.2") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $400 | $0 |