Olympus SP-100 vs Olympus TG-320
63 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a364/2a3647a98ab0bb484e2e78927db40e2edfac5dc0" alt="Olympus Stylus SP-100 front Olympus Stylus SP-100 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3ced/f3cedb69b934f7169f253825ad9ca28abd57cd22" alt="Olympus TG-320 front Olympus TG-320 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus SP-100 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Increase to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 594g - 122 x 91 x 133mm
- Released January 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus SP-100 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Below is a thorough assessment of the Olympus SP-100 vs Olympus TG-320, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof and they are both produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the SP-100 (16MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is relatively close and both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The SP-100 was manufactured 2 years later than the TG-320 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus SP-100 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the SP-100 grades versus the TG-320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus SP-100 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus SP-100 and Olympus TG-320. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus SP-100 Gallery and Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-100 over the Olympus TG-320
SP-100 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | ![]() | January 2012 | More recent by 25 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Olympus SP-100
TG-320 | SP-100 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus SP-100 and Olympus TG-320
SP-100 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Olympus SP-100 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SP-100 enjoys external dimensions of 122mm x 91mm x 133mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 5.2") along with a weight of 594 grams (1.31 lbs) while the Olympus TG-320 has dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Look at the Olympus SP-100 vs Olympus TG-320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the SP-100 versus the TG-320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3fe4/f3fe4a510a0e1f07a8fe97a476180952450f1659" alt="Olympus SP-100 vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison Olympus SP-100 vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the SP-100 and TG-320 is 63 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fae32/fae3266203ed37f83da8f013aad845dca10810f2" alt="Olympus SP-100 vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-100 vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-100 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to envision the gap in sensor measurements purely by viewing technical specs. The graphic here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-100 and TG-320.
As you can tell, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Olympus SP-100 to provide you with greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The newer SP-100 is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c534d/c534df4e96be2b76a57bce07c43b8d0f47a9e6a9" alt="Olympus SP-100 vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison Olympus SP-100 vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-100 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/088af/088afd92bce770bf0d09d05054ad0925f8eab072" alt="Olympus SP-100 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-100 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus SP-100 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SP-100 | Olympus TG-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus Stylus SP-100 | Olympus TG-320 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Released | 2014-01-29 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 920k dot | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1700s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 7.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Fill-in, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Optional | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 594g (1.31 pounds) | 155g (0.34 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 91 x 133mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 5.2") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | 150 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-92B | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $400 | $0 |