Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB1100F
63 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
![Olympus Stylus SP-100 front Olympus Stylus SP-100 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-Stylus-SP-100/Olympus-SP-100-front.jpg)
![Samsung WB1100F front Samsung WB1100F front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-WB1100F/Samsung-WB1100F-front.jpg)
67 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB1100F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 594g - 122 x 91 x 133mm
- Launched January 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 512g - 125 x 87 x 96mm
- Launched January 2014
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB1100F Overview
Below is a comprehensive overview of the Olympus SP-100 and Samsung WB1100F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the SP-100 (16MP) and the WB1100F (16MP) is very well matched and they enjoy the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The SP-100 was announced at a similar time to the WB1100F so they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the SP-100 grades versus the WB1100F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB1100F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus SP-100 and Samsung WB1100F. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus SP-100 Gallery and Samsung WB1100F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-100 over the Samsung WB1100F
SP-100 | WB1100F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB1100F over the Olympus SP-100
WB1100F | SP-100 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus SP-100 and Samsung WB1100F
SP-100 | WB1100F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | ![]() | January 2014 | Similar generation |
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display size |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | No Touch display |
Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB1100F Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SP-100 has external dimensions of 122mm x 91mm x 133mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 5.2") and a weight of 594 grams (1.31 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB1100F has dimensions of 125mm x 87mm x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") with a weight of 512 grams (1.13 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus SP-100 and Samsung WB1100F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is the front view size comparison of the SP-100 vs the WB1100F.
![Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB1100F size comparison Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB1100F size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-Stylus-SP-100-vs-Samsung-WB1100F-size-comparison.jpg)
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SP-100 and WB1100F is 63 and 67 respectively.
![Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB1100F top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB1100F top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-Stylus-SP-100-vs-Samsung-WB1100F-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB1100F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to picture the contrast between sensor measurements just by looking at specifications. The visual here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-100 and WB1100F.
Plainly, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical resolution so you should expect similar quality of images but you should factor the production date of the products into consideration.
![Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB1100F sensor size comparison Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB1100F sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-Stylus-SP-100-vs-Samsung-WB1100F-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB1100F Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB1100F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB1100F Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-Stylus-SP-100-vs-Samsung-WB1100F-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB1100F Specifications
Olympus Stylus SP-100 | Samsung WB1100F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus Stylus SP-100 | Samsung WB1100F |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2014-01-29 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 25-875mm (35.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 460k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 920k dot | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1700 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash options | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Fill-in, Off | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Optional | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 594 grams (1.31 lbs) | 512 grams (1.13 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 91 x 133mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 5.2") | 125 x 87 x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-92B | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $400 | $250 |