Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung CL5
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
95 Imaging
32 Features
14 Overall
24
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung CL5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
- 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
- Announced February 2009
- Also referred to as PL10
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung CL5 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung CL5, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and CL5 (9MP) and the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and CL5 (1/2.5") have totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-M1 was launched 5 years after the CL5 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL5 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the WG-M1 matches up vs the CL5 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung CL5 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung CL5. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Samsung CL5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung CL5
| WG-M1 | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 68 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL5 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| CL5 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 2.7" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Sharper screen (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung CL5
| WG-M1 | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung CL5 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-M1 has got external dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Samsung CL5 has sizing of 93mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") with a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung CL5 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the WG-M1 and the CL5.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and CL5 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung CL5 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions only by researching a spec sheet. The picture underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-M1 and CL5.
As you can see, both the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The WG-M1 because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Ricoh WG-M1 will render more detail utilizing its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs way more aggressively. The more modern WG-M1 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung CL5 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung CL5 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung CL5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung CL5 |
| Also referred to as | - | PL10 |
| Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2014-09-12 | 2009-02-23 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | (1×) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-4.5 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 1.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 115k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | - | 16 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190g (0.42 pounds) | 141g (0.31 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | DB-65 | - |
| Self timer | - | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $2,000 | $391 |