Olympus SP-820UZ vs Ricoh CX2
69 Imaging
37 Features
29 Overall
33
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-896mm (F3.4-5.7) lens
- 485g - 117 x 78 x 93mm
- Introduced August 2012
- Earlier Model is Olympus SP-820UZ
- Refreshed by Olympus SP-820UZ
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Released August 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus SP-820UZ vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
Here, we are comparing the Olympus SP-820UZ versus Ricoh CX2, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the SP-820UZ (14MP) and CX2 (9MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SP-820UZ was brought out 3 years after the CX2 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the SP-820UZ scores against the CX2 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SP-820UZ vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ and Ricoh CX2. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery and Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-820UZ over the Ricoh CX2
| SP-820UZ | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2012 |  | August 2009 | Newer by 37 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus SP-820UZ
| CX2 | SP-820UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-820UZ and Ricoh CX2
| SP-820UZ | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither provides Touch display |
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera often, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus SP-820UZ provides outside measurements of 117mm x 78mm x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") and a weight of 485 grams (1.07 lbs) while the Ricoh CX2 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Compare the Olympus SP-820UZ versus Ricoh CX2 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the SP-820UZ against the CX2.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SP-820UZ and CX2 is 69 and 93 respectively.
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to envision the gap in sensor dimensions just by looking through technical specs. The picture here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the SP-820UZ and CX2.
As you can tell, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Olympus SP-820UZ to render extra detail having its extra 5MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more recent SP-820UZ is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | Ricoh CX2 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2012-08-21 | 2009-08-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 22-896mm (40.7x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.7 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 15.00 m | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 180 (30, 240 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 485 gr (1.07 pounds) | 185 gr (0.41 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 117 x 78 x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $299 | $341 |