Olympus SP-820UZ vs Ricoh GR Digital III
69 Imaging
37 Features
29 Overall
33


92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-896mm (F3.4-5.7) lens
- 485g - 117 x 78 x 93mm
- Announced August 2012
- Earlier Model is Olympus SP-820UZ
- New Model is Olympus SP-820UZ
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Launched July 2009
- Successor is Ricoh GR Digital IV

Olympus SP-820UZ vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
Following is a extensive comparison of the Olympus SP-820UZ versus Ricoh GR Digital III, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the SP-820UZ (14MP) and GR Digital III (10MP) and the SP-820UZ (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") provide different sensor dimensions.

The SP-820UZ was revealed 3 years after the GR Digital III which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the SP-820UZ matches up against the GR Digital III in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus SP-820UZ vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ and Ricoh GR Digital III. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-820UZ over the Ricoh GR Digital III
SP-820UZ | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2012 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 38 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Olympus SP-820UZ
GR Digital III | SP-820UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-820UZ and Ricoh GR Digital III
SP-820UZ | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus SP-820UZ enjoys outside measurements of 117mm x 78mm x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") and a weight of 485 grams (1.07 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital III has proportions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Check the Olympus SP-820UZ versus Ricoh GR Digital III in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the SP-820UZ and the GR Digital III.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SP-820UZ and GR Digital III is 69 and 92 respectively.

Olympus SP-820UZ vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizes just by going over specs. The picture here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the SP-820UZ and GR Digital III.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The SP-820UZ with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh tougher and the Olympus SP-820UZ will deliver extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The more modern SP-820UZ should have an advantage in sensor innovation.

Olympus SP-820UZ vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus SP-820UZ vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2012-08-21 | 2009-07-27 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 22-896mm (40.7x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.4-5.7 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 15.00 m | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 180 (30, 240 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 485 grams (1.07 pounds) | 208 grams (0.46 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 78 x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $299 | $399 |