Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-320
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Also referred to as mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Replacement is Olympus VR-330
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-320, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both created by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is pretty similar and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The Tough-3000 was brought out 18 months before the VR-320 which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a quick summation of how the Tough-3000 grades against the VR-320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 and Olympus VR-320. The entire galleries are available at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus VR-320
Tough-3000 | VR-320 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus Tough-3000
VR-320 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2011 | ![]() | January 2010 | Newer by 18 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Olympus VR-320
Tough-3000 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus Tough-3000 features outside measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the Tough-3000 and the VR-320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec6ec/ec6ec298c3e2dbb8572777408259380fc22aaccc" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the Tough-3000 and VR-320 is 94 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba415/ba415baf2140195eb7c88bf67992aa798cbcca14" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading technical specs. The pic below may provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Tough-3000 and VR-320.
As you can tell, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Olympus VR-320 to offer you greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged Tough-3000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b01a0/b01a09a2e9771696018a99b2c008a2ffe1003820" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison"
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b088/4b0881e78dcfded37cfbd8808b71aa469a9514c7" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Olympus VR-320 |
Also called as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2010-01-07 | 2011-07-19 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 2cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 159g (0.35 lb) | 158g (0.35 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $0 | $179 |