Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-70
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
62 Imaging
67 Features
81 Overall
72
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Released January 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 688g - 126 x 93 x 74mm
- Introduced June 2016
- Updated by Pentax KF
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-70 Overview
Following is a complete comparison of the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Pentax K-70, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Pentax. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and K-70 (24MP) and the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and K-70 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Tough-3000 was released 7 years earlier than the K-70 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-70 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the Tough-3000 scores against the K-70 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-70 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Pentax K-70. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Pentax K-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Pentax K-70
Tough-3000 | K-70 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax K-70 over the Olympus Tough-3000
K-70 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2016 | January 2010 | More modern by 78 months | |
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Pentax K-70
Tough-3000 | K-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-70 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus Tough-3000 enjoys exterior measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-70 has sizing of 126mm x 93mm x 74mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 2.9") and a weight of 688 grams (1.52 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Pentax K-70 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the Tough-3000 compared to the K-70.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Tough-3000 and K-70 is 94 and 62 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-70 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizes just by researching technical specs. The image below will help give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Tough-3000 and K-70.
As you have seen, both of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Tough-3000 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting bokeh harder and the Pentax K-70 will result in extra detail as a result of its extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged Tough-3000 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K-70 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Pentax K-70 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Pentax K-70 |
Otherwise known as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2010-01-07 | 2016-06-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | PRIME MII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 102400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.63x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash + redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync, manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 159 gr (0.35 lbs) | 688 gr (1.52 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 126 x 93 x 74mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 410 pictures |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, continuous) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I compatible) |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $0 | $649 |