Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K200D
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
61 Imaging
50 Features
41 Overall
46
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K200D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Announced January 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 690g - 134 x 95 x 74mm
- Introduced September 2008
- Superseded the Pentax K100D S
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K200D Overview
Below is a extensive comparison of the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K200D, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and the K200D (10MP) is pretty comparable but the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and K200D (APS-C) use different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Tough-3000 was announced 17 months later than the K200D which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K200D being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the Tough-3000 scores against the K200D in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K200D Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 and Pentax K200D. The whole galleries are available at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery and Pentax K200D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Pentax K200D
Tough-3000 | K200D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2010 | September 2008 | More recent by 17 months |
Reasons to pick Pentax K200D over the Olympus Tough-3000
K200D | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focus |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Pentax K200D
Tough-3000 | K200D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K200D Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus Tough-3000 enjoys outside dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Pentax K200D has dimensions of 134mm x 95mm x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 690 grams (1.52 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K200D in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the Tough-3000 compared to the K200D.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Tough-3000 and K200D is 94 and 61 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K200D Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to imagine the gap in sensor measurements merely by going through specs. The graphic here should provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Tough-3000 and K200D.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The Tough-3000 using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting bokeh harder and the Olympus Tough-3000 will provide greater detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The fresher Tough-3000 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K200D Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Pentax K200D Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Pentax K200D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Pentax K200D |
Also called as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2010-01-07 | 2008-09-01 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3872 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 159 gr (0.35 pounds) | 690 gr (1.52 pounds) |
Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 134 x 95 x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 561 |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $0 | $600 |