Clicky

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV

Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
26
Overall
31
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front
 
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs

Olympus Tough-3000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
  • Revealed January 2010
  • Additionally Known as mju Tough 3000
Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Released September 2011
  • Old Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview

Lets look closer at the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is very well matched but the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") provide different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The Tough-3000 was revealed 20 months earlier than the GR Digital IV making them a generation away from one another. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before diving into a thorough comparison, here is a short summary of how the Tough-3000 matches up versus the GR Digital IV when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 Tough-3000 GR Digital IV 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus Tough-3000

 GR Digital IV Tough-3000 
ReleasedSeptember 2011January 2010More modern by 20 months
Manually focus Dial accurate focus
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1230k230kClearer display (+1000k dot)

Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Ricoh GR Digital IV

 Tough-3000 GR Digital IV 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus Tough-3000 has got outer dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital IV has dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Check the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the Tough-3000 versus the GR Digital IV.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Tough-3000 and GR Digital IV is 94 and 92 respectively.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizes merely by looking at technical specs. The image here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Tough-3000 and GR Digital IV.

As you have seen, both of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Tough-3000 with its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF tougher and the Olympus Tough-3000 will give more detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged Tough-3000 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Portrait photography camera
21
no manual focus
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
41
you can focus manually
saves RAW formats
low megapixels (10MP)
small sensor (1/1.7")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Street photography information
Ricoh GR Digital IV Street photography information
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/1.7")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus Tough-3000
Sports photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
36
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features tracking autofocus
environment proof
slow frames per second (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
better than average battery (390 CIPA)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
low megapixels (10MP)
small sensor (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Travel photography camera
61
environment proof
flash built-in
fairly wide (28mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
MP count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
67
better than average battery (390 shots)
has built in flash
fast maximum aperture (f1.9)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus Tough-3000
Landscape photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
35
fairly wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
no manual exposure
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
does not have Time Lapse mode
53
you can focus manually
fast maximum aperture (f1.9)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
better than average battery (390 shots)
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
low megapixels (10MP)
small sensor (1/1.7")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Vlogging factors
Ricoh GR Digital IV Vlogging factors
28
fairly wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external mic socket
29
fast maximum aperture (f1.9)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of microphone socket
Photography Glossary

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus Tough-3000 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
 Olympus Stylus Tough-3000Ricoh GR Digital IV
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 Ricoh GR Digital IV
Also referred to as mju Tough 3000 -
Category Waterproof Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2010-01-07 2011-09-15
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 3968 x 2976 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 64 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-102mm (3.6x) 28mm (1x)
Maximal aperture f/3.5-5.1 f/1.9
Macro focusing distance 2cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.9 4.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7" 3"
Display resolution 230k dots 1,230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 1s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 1.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 4.00 m 3.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format MPEG-4 Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 159g (0.35 pounds) 190g (0.42 pounds)
Physical dimensions 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 390 photos
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery ID - DB65
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Retail pricing $0 $599