Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Released September 2011
- Old Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Lets look closer at the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is very well matched but the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") provide different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Tough-3000 was revealed 20 months earlier than the GR Digital IV making them a generation away from one another. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a thorough comparison, here is a short summary of how the Tough-3000 matches up versus the GR Digital IV when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 and Ricoh GR Digital IV. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
Tough-3000 | GR Digital IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus Tough-3000
GR Digital IV | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2011 | January 2010 | More modern by 20 months | |
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1230k | 230k | Clearer display (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
Tough-3000 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus Tough-3000 has got outer dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital IV has dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the Tough-3000 versus the GR Digital IV.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Tough-3000 and GR Digital IV is 94 and 92 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizes merely by looking at technical specs. The image here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Tough-3000 and GR Digital IV.
As you have seen, both of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Tough-3000 with its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF tougher and the Olympus Tough-3000 will give more detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged Tough-3000 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Also referred to as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2010-01-07 | 2011-09-15 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 1,230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 159g (0.35 pounds) | 190g (0.42 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 390 photos |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $0 | $599 |