Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
94 Imaging
34 Features
26 Overall
30
88 Imaging
52 Features
37 Overall
46
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Launched January 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Announced September 2010
Photography Glossary Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Overview
Following is a detailed comparison of the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) is pretty close but the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) offer different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Tough-3000 was launched 8 months earlier than the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 which means that they are of a similar generation. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a short summation of how the Tough-3000 scores versus the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
| Tough-3000 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Olympus Tough-3000
| GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2010 | January 2010 | More modern by 8 months | |
| Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
| Tough-3000 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus Tough-3000 has got exterior dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has specifications of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") with a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Compare the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the Tough-3000 compared to the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Tough-3000 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 is 94 and 88 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes just by looking through a spec sheet. The picture here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Tough-3000 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
As you can see, both of those cameras come with the identical megapixels albeit different sensor sizes. The Tough-3000 uses the smaller sensor which should make obtaining bokeh more difficult. The more aged Tough-3000 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
| Also Known as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
| Type | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2010-01-07 | 2010-09-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | GR Engine III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 370.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 2848 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 200 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 180 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 159g (0.35 lbs) | 140g (0.31 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 320 photographs |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | DB-90 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $0 | $566 |