Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Released January 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Launched August 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and Galaxy Camera 3G (16MP) but they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Tough-3000 was announced 3 years earlier than the Galaxy Camera 3G and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a thorough comparison, below is a short overview of how the Tough-3000 grades vs the Galaxy Camera 3G when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
| Tough-3000 | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 0k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G over the Olympus Tough-3000
| Galaxy Camera 3G | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2012 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 32 months |
| Display dimension | 4.8" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+2.1") |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
| Tough-3000 | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus Tough-3000 has external dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G has specifications of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") and a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Check out the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is the front view scale comparison of the Tough-3000 against the Galaxy Camera 3G.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Tough-3000 and Galaxy Camera 3G is 94 and 90 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizing merely by seeing specs. The photograph below should offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Tough-3000 and Galaxy Camera 3G.
All in all, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G to provide greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older Tough-3000 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G |
| Also called as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-01-07 | 2012-08-29 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | - |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 4.8 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 0k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | - | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 159 grams (0.35 lb) | 305 grams (0.67 lb) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $0 | $606 |