Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung NX2000
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
89 Imaging
63 Features
68 Overall
65
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung NX2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Released January 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 228g - 119 x 65 x 36mm
- Introduced November 2013
- Superseded the Samsung NX1100
- New Model is Samsung NX3000
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung NX2000 Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Samsung NX2000, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Samsung. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and NX2000 (20MP) and the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and NX2000 (APS-C) have different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Tough-3000 was announced 4 years before the NX2000 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX2000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the Tough-3000 grades vs the NX2000 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung NX2000 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Samsung NX2000. The whole galleries are available at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Samsung NX2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Samsung NX2000
Tough-3000 | NX2000 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX2000 over the Olympus Tough-3000
NX2000 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | November 2013 | January 2010 | Fresher by 47 months | |
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Display size | 3.7" | 2.7" | Larger display (+1") | |
Display resolution | 1152k | 230k | Clearer display (+922k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Samsung NX2000
Tough-3000 | NX2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung NX2000 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus Tough-3000 has got external measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX2000 has dimensions of 119mm x 65mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") with a weight of 228 grams (0.50 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Samsung NX2000 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the Tough-3000 compared to the NX2000.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Tough-3000 and NX2000 is 94 and 89 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung NX2000 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizing simply by researching specs. The graphic below may provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Tough-3000 and NX2000.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Tough-3000 with its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh more challenging and the Samsung NX2000 will render extra detail with its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older Tough-3000 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung NX2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung NX2000 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Samsung NX2000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Samsung NX2000 |
Otherwise known as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2010-01-07 | 2013-11-30 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focus distance | 2cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,152 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 159 gr (0.35 pounds) | 228 gr (0.50 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 119 x 65 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 75 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 908 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC/ MicroSDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $0 | $599 |