Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31


83 Imaging
55 Features
33 Overall
46
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Also referred to as mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Revealed February 2012
- Superseded the Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Newer Model is Sigma DP3 Merrill

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview
Below is a extended assessment of the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Sigma DP2 Merrill, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Sigma. The resolution of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and the DP2 Merrill (15MP) is pretty well matched but the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) boast totally different sensor measurements.

The Tough-3000 was manufactured 3 years before the DP2 Merrill and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the Tough-3000 scores vs the DP2 Merrill in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 and Sigma DP2 Merrill. The entire galleries are available at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery and Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
Tough-3000 | DP2 Merrill |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Olympus Tough-3000
DP2 Merrill | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2012 | ![]() | January 2010 | More recent by 25 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Sigma DP2 Merrill
Tough-3000 | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera, you have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus Tough-3000 comes with physical measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Merrill has specifications of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") accompanied by a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Sigma DP2 Merrill in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the Tough-3000 and the DP2 Merrill.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the Tough-3000 and DP2 Merrill is 94 and 83 respectively.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to envision the contrast between sensor measurements only by looking at specs. The photograph here might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the Tough-3000 and DP2 Merrill.
All in all, each of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Tough-3000 due to its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Sigma DP2 Merrill will give greater detail due to its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older Tough-3000 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sigma DP2 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sigma |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sigma DP2 Merrill |
Also Known as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2010-01-07 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4704 x 3136 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 50mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 2cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640x480 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 159 grams (0.35 lb) | 330 grams (0.73 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $0 | $931 |