Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A900
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
54 Imaging
66 Features
62 Overall
64
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
- Released October 2008
- Newer Model is Sony A99
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A900 Overview
In this write-up, we will be comparing the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A900, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and A900 (25MP) and the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and A900 (Full frame) use different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Tough-3000 was launched 15 months after the A900 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the Tough-3000 grades vs the A900 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A900 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A900. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery and Sony A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Sony A900
Tough-3000 | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2010 | October 2008 | More modern by 15 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Olympus Tough-3000
A900 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper screen (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Sony A900
Tough-3000 | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus Tough-3000 has outside measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Sony A900 has dimensions of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).
Examine the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A900 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the Tough-3000 and the A900.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Tough-3000 and A900 is 94 and 54 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizes purely by looking at specs. The picture below might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Tough-3000 and A900.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Tough-3000 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sony A900 will resolve extra detail utilizing its extra 13MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a little more aggressively. The newer Tough-3000 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A900 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 |
Also Known as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2010-01-07 | 2008-10-22 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 25 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 6048 x 4032 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focus range | 2cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 159 gr (0.35 lbs) | 895 gr (1.97 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1431 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 880 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
Card slots | One | Two |
Price at launch | $0 | $2,736 |