Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony NEX-5T
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b21bb/b21bb9e64609d6ff611ab5287732608d0fbd5fd6" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-5T front Sony Alpha NEX-5T front"
89 Imaging
58 Features
79 Overall
66
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony NEX-5T Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Also referred to as mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 276g - 111 x 59 x 39mm
- Introduced August 2013
- Superseded the Sony NEX-5R
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony NEX-5T Overview
The following is a thorough overview of the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony NEX-5T, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and NEX-5T (16MP) and the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and NEX-5T (APS-C) posses totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The Tough-3000 was introduced 4 years earlier than the NEX-5T which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-5T being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the Tough-3000 scores vs the NEX-5T in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony NEX-5T Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Sony Alpha NEX-5T. The whole galleries are available at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Sony NEX-5T Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Sony NEX-5T
Tough-3000 | NEX-5T |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-5T over the Olympus Tough-3000
NEX-5T | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2013 | ![]() | January 2010 | Newer by 44 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Sony NEX-5T
Tough-3000 | NEX-5T |
---|
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony NEX-5T Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus Tough-3000 has exterior dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Sony NEX-5T has dimensions of 111mm x 59mm x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") along with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony NEX-5T in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the Tough-3000 vs the NEX-5T.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/339d3/339d3385454be1845401537b479724b3108a3351" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony NEX-5T size comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony NEX-5T size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Tough-3000 and NEX-5T is 94 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf2a2/bf2a205e911318a770e3e7a79012aa7f2192f894" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony NEX-5T top view buttons comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony NEX-5T top view buttons comparison"
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony NEX-5T Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to see the gap between sensor dimensions merely by checking a spec sheet. The image below will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Tough-3000 and NEX-5T.
Clearly, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Tough-3000 using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field trickier and the Sony NEX-5T will resolve more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged Tough-3000 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/372e6/372e6f22ed007bf78541ba60b0ace3ec676f8d60" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony NEX-5T sensor size comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony NEX-5T sensor size comparison"
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony NEX-5T Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/658e7/658e7751f3e4ee7421dc31dd5ad81cec1067b805" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony NEX-5T Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony NEX-5T Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony NEX-5T Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony Alpha NEX-5T | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony Alpha NEX-5T |
Also Known as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2010-01-07 | 2013-08-27 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 99 |
Cross focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focus range | 2cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | Tilt Up 180° Down 50° TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 7.00 m (ISO100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x1080 (60p/60i/24p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 159 grams (0.35 lbs) | 276 grams (0.61 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 111 x 59 x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.0 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1015 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes ((10/2 sec. delay), Self-timer (Cont.) (with 10 sec. delay; 3/5 exposures)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $0 | $400 |