Clicky

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung HZ35W

Portability
92
Imaging
33
Features
34
Overall
33
Ricoh CX4 front
 
Samsung HZ35W front
Portability
91
Imaging
35
Features
42
Overall
37

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs

Ricoh CX4
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
  • Announced August 2010
Samsung HZ35W
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
  • Announced June 2010
  • Also Known as WB650
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview

On this page, we will be reviewing the Ricoh CX4 versus Samsung HZ35W, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the CX4 (10MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The CX4 was announced 3 months later than the HZ35W and they are both of a similar age. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before delving into a full comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the CX4 matches up versus the HZ35W when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Samsung HZ35W

 CX4 HZ35W 
Screen resolution920k614kSharper screen (+306k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Ricoh CX4

 HZ35W CX4 

Common features in the Ricoh CX4 and Samsung HZ35W

 CX4 HZ35W 
AnnouncedAugust 2010June 2010Similar age
Focus manually More accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurement
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Neither has Touch screen

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison

If you are intending to lug around your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh CX4 has physical measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ35W has dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Check the Ricoh CX4 versus Samsung HZ35W in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the CX4 against the HZ35W.

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung HZ35W size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the CX4 and HZ35W is 92 and 91 respectively.

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung HZ35W top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be difficult to picture the contrast between sensor measurements just by checking specifications. The photograph underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the CX4 and HZ35W.

To sum up, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can expect the Samsung HZ35W to give greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively.

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung HZ35W sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh CX4
Portrait photography with Samsung HZ35W
26
focusing manually
no manual control
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
34
has manual focus
offers face detection focusing
can't use external flash
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Ricoh CX4 as a Street photography camera
Samsung HZ35W as a Street photography camera
60
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (205g)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
60
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (245g)
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Ricoh CX4 Sports photography features
Samsung HZ35W Sports photography features
24
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
painfully slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
42
incredible zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers tracking autofocus
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Ricoh CX4
Travel photography with Samsung HZ35W
66
lighter than competition (205g)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
very long reach (300mm)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
63
lighter than competition (245 grams)
built-in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
very long reach (360mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh CX4 Landscape photography features
Samsung HZ35W Landscape photography features
42
focusing manually
reasonably wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
sensor resolution low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
43
has manual focus
fairly wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
lack of Time Lapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX4 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung HZ35W as a Vlogging camera
30
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (205g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have microphone port
31
fairly wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focusing
lighter than competition (245g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
display is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external mic support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX4 and Samsung HZ35W
 Ricoh CX4Samsung HZ35W
General Information
Company Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh CX4 Samsung HZ35W
Also Known as - WB650
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2010-08-19 2010-06-16
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-300mm (10.7x) 24-360mm (15.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.5-5.6 f/3.2-5.8
Macro focusing range 1cm 3cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 920 thousand dots 614 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8s 16s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 5.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 4.00 m 5.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 205g (0.45 pounds) 245g (0.54 pounds)
Physical dimensions 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID DB-100 SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots One One
Pricing at launch $211 $300