Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX1
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee583/ee583f748fd6792621224bae481c6c24c305fe26" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 front"
67 Imaging
32 Features
36 Overall
33
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1440 x 1080 video
- 28-560mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 544g - 115 x 83 x 92mm
- Launched April 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX1 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX1, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a crucial gap among the resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and HX1 (9MP) and the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and HX1 (1/2.4") have different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The Tough-3000 was released 9 months later than the HX1 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the Tough-3000 grades versus the HX1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery and Sony HX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Sony HX1
Tough-3000 | HX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2010 | ![]() | April 2009 | More recent by 9 months |
Reasons to pick Sony HX1 over the Olympus Tough-3000
HX1 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Sony HX1
Tough-3000 | HX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX1 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus Tough-3000 features external dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Sony HX1 has measurements of 115mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 3.6") with a weight of 544 grams (1.20 lbs).
See the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the Tough-3000 and the HX1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50f32/50f329a18e333271c81f89805d0f225eac5cbbd8" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX1 size comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX1 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Tough-3000 and HX1 is 94 and 67 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0bdd6/0bdd6a97f0bd083fc40559f053a6e9c992b42dc5" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX1 top view buttons comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements merely by going through technical specs. The visual here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Tough-3000 and HX1.
As you have seen, both of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The Tough-3000 due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus Tough-3000 will show greater detail as a result of its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics way more aggressively. The more recent Tough-3000 should have a benefit in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29ff0/29ff0b86a34d23b7e797f04e4338d5bf9a178a43" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX1 sensor size comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d2f3/1d2f39dd9d9adef7017038bd88d669e595a080fd" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX1 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 |
Other name | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2010-01-07 | 2009-04-22 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3456 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-560mm (20.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8-5.2 |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 9.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1440x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 159g (0.35 lbs) | 544g (1.20 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 115 x 83 x 92mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $0 | $47,999 |