Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX300
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
63 Imaging
44 Features
51 Overall
46
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Revealed February 2013
- Replaced the Sony HX200V
- Successor is Sony HX400V
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX300 Overview
Below, we are matching up the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX300, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and HX300 (20MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Tough-3000 was introduced 4 years earlier than the HX300 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go through a in depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the Tough-3000 grades versus the HX300 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX300 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Sony HX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Sony HX300
Tough-3000 | HX300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Olympus Tough-3000
HX300 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2013 | January 2010 | Fresher by 38 months | |
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Sony HX300
Tough-3000 | HX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus Tough-3000 has physical measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Sony HX300 has dimensions of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") and a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).
Compare the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX300 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the Tough-3000 against the HX300.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the Tough-3000 and HX300 is 94 and 63 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing only by checking out specifications. The visual here will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Tough-3000 and HX300.
Plainly, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can expect to see the Sony HX300 to provide greater detail using its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older Tough-3000 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX300 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
Alternate name | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2010-01-07 | 2013-02-20 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 159 grams (0.35 pounds) | 623 grams (1.37 pounds) |
Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $0 | $339 |