Clicky

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX300

Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
26
Overall
31
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 front
Portability
63
Imaging
44
Features
51
Overall
46

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX300 Key Specs

Olympus Tough-3000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
  • Revealed January 2010
  • Alternative Name is mju Tough 3000
Sony HX300
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 80 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
  • 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
  • Revealed February 2013
  • Replaced the Sony HX200V
  • Successor is Sony HX400V
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX300 Overview

Below, we are matching up the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX300, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and HX300 (20MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The Tough-3000 was introduced 4 years earlier than the HX300 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before we go through a in depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the Tough-3000 grades versus the HX300 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Sony HX300

 Tough-3000 HX300 

Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Olympus Tough-3000

 HX300 Tough-3000 
RevealedFebruary 2013January 2010Fresher by 38 months
Focus manually More accurate focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution921k230kCrisper display (+691k dot)

Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Sony HX300

 Tough-3000 HX300 
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch display Lack of Touch display

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to carry your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus Tough-3000 has physical measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Sony HX300 has dimensions of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") and a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).

Compare the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX300 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the Tough-3000 against the HX300.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX300 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the Tough-3000 and HX300 is 94 and 63 respectively.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison

Often, it's tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing only by checking out specifications. The visual here will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Tough-3000 and HX300.

Plainly, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can expect to see the Sony HX300 to provide greater detail using its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older Tough-3000 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX300 sensor size comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus Tough-3000
Portrait photography with Sony HX300
21
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
42
has manual focus
decent megapixels (20MP)
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 as a Street photography camera
Sony HX300 as a Street photography camera
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
screen is fixed
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
50
screen tilts
has image stabilization (Optical)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
heavier than average in class (623g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Sports photography information
Sony HX300 Sports photography information
36
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking focus
environment sealing
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
55
excellent zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Travel photography information
Sony HX300 Travel photography information
61
environment sealing
built-in flash
decently wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
resolution not great (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
54
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
long reach (1200mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than average in class (623g)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus Tough-3000
Landscape photography with Sony HX300
35
decently wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7 inches)
no manual mode
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
lack of Time Lapse function
48
has manual focus
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
missing Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 as a Vlogging camera
Sony HX300 as a Vlogging camera
28
decently wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of mic port
25
reasonably wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
missing mic socket
heavier than average in class (623 grams)
Photography Glossary

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus Tough-3000 and Sony HX300
 Olympus Stylus Tough-3000Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
Alternate name mju Tough 3000 -
Category Waterproof Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2010-01-07 2013-02-20
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 -
Peak resolution 3968 x 2976 5184 x 3888
Highest native ISO 1600 12800
Minimum native ISO 64 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-102mm (3.6x) 24-1200mm (50.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.5-5.1 f/2.8-6.3
Macro focusing range 2cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.9 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen diagonal 2.7 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 921 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 1.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.00 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4 -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 159 grams (0.35 pounds) 623 grams (1.37 pounds)
Dimensions 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 seconds) -
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal -
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $0 $339