Olympus 6000 vs Olympus VR-340
94 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus 6000 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Other Name is mju Tough 6000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus 6000 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
Below is a thorough review of the Olympus 6000 versus Olympus VR-340, both Small Sensor Compact cameras and both are created by Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the 6000 (10MP) and VR-340 (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe 6000 was unveiled 3 years earlier than the VR-340 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the 6000 grades against the VR-340 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus 6000 vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 & Olympus VR-340. The full galleries are provided at Olympus 6000 Gallery & Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Olympus VR-340
| 6000 | VR-340 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Olympus 6000
| VR-340 | 6000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 30 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6000 and Olympus VR-340
| 6000 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Olympus 6000 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera often, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus 6000 provides external dimensions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Olympus VR-340 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
See the Olympus 6000 versus Olympus VR-340 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using during that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the 6000 and the VR-340.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the 6000 and VR-340 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Olympus 6000 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to envision the gap in sensor measurements purely by viewing technical specs. The graphic underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the 6000 and VR-340.
As you can tell, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Olympus VR-340 to provide you with more detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older 6000 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus 6000 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus 6000 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | Olympus VR-340 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | Olympus VR-340 |
| Other name | mju Tough 6000 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-07-01 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.0-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 179 gr (0.39 lbs) | 125 gr (0.28 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $259 | $130 |