Olympus 6000 vs Olympus VR-340
94 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus 6000 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Other Name is mju Tough 6000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus 6000 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
Below is a thorough review of the Olympus 6000 versus Olympus VR-340, both Small Sensor Compact cameras and both are created by Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the 6000 (10MP) and VR-340 (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe 6000 was unveiled 3 years earlier than the VR-340 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the 6000 grades against the VR-340 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus 6000 vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 & Olympus VR-340. The full galleries are provided at Olympus 6000 Gallery & Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Olympus VR-340
| 6000 | VR-340 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Olympus 6000
| VR-340 | 6000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 30 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6000 and Olympus VR-340
| 6000 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Olympus 6000 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera often, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus 6000 provides external dimensions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Olympus VR-340 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
See the Olympus 6000 versus Olympus VR-340 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using during that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the 6000 and the VR-340.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the 6000 and VR-340 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Olympus 6000 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to envision the gap in sensor measurements purely by viewing technical specs. The graphic underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the 6000 and VR-340.
As you can tell, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Olympus VR-340 to provide you with more detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older 6000 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus 6000 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus 6000 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | Olympus VR-340 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | Olympus VR-340 |
| Other name | mju Tough 6000 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-07-01 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.0-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 179 gr (0.39 lbs) | 125 gr (0.28 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $259 | $130 |