Olympus 6000 vs Panasonic FX78
94 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
95 Imaging
35 Features
31 Overall
33
Olympus 6000 vs Panasonic FX78 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Also Known as mju Tough 6000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
- 142g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Launched January 2011
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FX77
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus 6000 vs Panasonic FX78 Overview
Below is a complete comparison of the Olympus 6000 vs Panasonic FX78, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the 6000 (10MP) and the FX78 (12MP) is relatively close and they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe 6000 was launched 19 months before the FX78 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a in depth comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the 6000 scores vs the FX78 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus 6000 vs Panasonic FX78 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78. The complete galleries are available at Olympus 6000 Gallery & Panasonic FX78 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Panasonic FX78
| 6000 | FX78 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX78 over the Olympus 6000
| FX78 | 6000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 19 months |
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 6000 and Panasonic FX78
| 6000 | FX78 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus 6000 vs Panasonic FX78 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 6000 comes with external dimensions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX78 has dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus 6000 vs Panasonic FX78 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the 6000 against the FX78.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the 6000 and FX78 is 94 and 95 respectively.
Olympus 6000 vs Panasonic FX78 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to picture the contrast in sensor measurements simply by viewing specifications. The visual below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the 6000 and FX78.
Plainly, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can count on the Panasonic FX78 to render extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older 6000 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus 6000 vs Panasonic FX78 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus 6000 vs Panasonic FX78 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 |
| Also called as | mju Tough 6000 | Lumix DMC-FX77 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2009-07-01 | 2011-01-25 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine FHD |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 60s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1400s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 5.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 179 gr (0.39 lbs) | 142 gr (0.31 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 200 shots |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $259 | $210 |