Olympus 6000 vs Panasonic FZ2500
94 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
53 Imaging
53 Features
81 Overall
64
Olympus 6000 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Other Name is mju Tough 6000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Announced September 2016
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Replaced the Panasonic FZ1000
Olympus 6000 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Olympus 6000 vs Panasonic FZ2500, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the 6000 (10MP) and FZ2500 (20MP) and the 6000 (1/2.3") and FZ2500 (1") come with totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe 6000 was introduced 8 years earlier than the FZ2500 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 6000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the 6000 scores versus the FZ2500 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus 6000 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus 6000 Gallery & Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Panasonic FZ2500
6000 | FZ2500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus 6000
FZ2500 | 6000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | July 2009 | Newer by 87 months | |
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 6000 and Panasonic FZ2500
6000 | FZ2500 |
---|
Olympus 6000 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus 6000 has physical measurements of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ2500 has specifications of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") having a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus 6000 vs Panasonic FZ2500 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the 6000 versus the FZ2500.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 6000 and FZ2500 is 94 and 53 respectively.
Olympus 6000 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to envision the difference in sensor dimensions purely by viewing technical specs. The image here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the 6000 and FZ2500.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The 6000 having a smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Panasonic FZ2500 will provide you with extra detail using its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged 6000 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus 6000 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 6000 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
Alternative name | mju Tough 6000 | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-07-01 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus distance | 2cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 12.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 4096x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 179 gr (0.39 lb) | 915 gr (2.02 lb) |
Dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 shots |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | DMW-BLC12 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $259 | $998 |