Olympus 6000 vs Pentax K110D
94 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9387/c9387039ab5c223fcc36ca8de7fbd3b8f5516027" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 front Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b26ee/b26ee354c3adaf0307bfc7498c215c4050aaeba0" alt="Pentax K110D front Pentax K110D front"
67 Imaging
44 Features
30 Overall
38
Olympus 6000 vs Pentax K110D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 6000
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 585g - 129 x 93 x 70mm
- Revealed May 2006
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus 6000 vs Pentax K110D Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Olympus 6000 and Pentax K110D, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the 6000 (10MP) and K110D (6MP) and the 6000 (1/2.3") and K110D (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The 6000 was launched 3 years after the K110D which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 6000 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K110D being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the 6000 grades against the K110D with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus 6000 vs Pentax K110D Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 and Pentax K110D. The complete galleries are available at Olympus 6000 Gallery and Pentax K110D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Pentax K110D
6000 | K110D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2009 | ![]() | May 2006 | More modern by 38 months |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 210k | Sharper screen (+20k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax K110D over the Olympus 6000
K110D | 6000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus 6000 and Pentax K110D
6000 | K110D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 6000 vs Pentax K110D Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus 6000 has physical dimensions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Pentax K110D has sizing of 129mm x 93mm x 70mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.8") with a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs).
Look at the Olympus 6000 and Pentax K110D in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the 6000 versus the K110D.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61ea6/61ea63d23517daffee09c2ee4981f7ed1df205b4" alt="Olympus 6000 vs Pentax K110D size comparison Olympus 6000 vs Pentax K110D size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 6000 and K110D is 94 and 67 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6d9f/d6d9f3d8b8880b64101158c828429ca832ef85e5" alt="Olympus 6000 vs Pentax K110D top view buttons comparison Olympus 6000 vs Pentax K110D top view buttons comparison"
Olympus 6000 vs Pentax K110D Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizes simply by checking a spec sheet. The picture underneath may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the 6000 and K110D.
As you can see, both of those cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The 6000 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Olympus 6000 will resolve more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more recent 6000 provides an edge in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a68a/3a68a2c5b270f4015090710b9ecde8b62ad1c72d" alt="Olympus 6000 vs Pentax K110D sensor size comparison Olympus 6000 vs Pentax K110D sensor size comparison"
Olympus 6000 vs Pentax K110D Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25e48/25e489967b31fb257fea1dd14deee8faa72215b3" alt="Olympus 6000 vs Pentax K110D Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus 6000 vs Pentax K110D Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus 6000 vs Pentax K110D Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | Pentax K110D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | Pentax K110D |
Also Known as | mju Tough 6000 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2009-07-01 | 2006-05-22 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 6 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3008 x 2008 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 50 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 2.5" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 210 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 179g (0.39 pounds) | 585g (1.29 pounds) |
Dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 129 x 93 x 70mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/MMC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $259 | $1,000 |