Olympus 6000 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
94 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
90 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
Olympus 6000 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Also Known as mju Tough 6000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Succeeded the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-6
Olympus 6000 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
In this write-up, we are looking at the Olympus 6000 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the 6000 (10MP) and WG-5 GPS (16MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe 6000 was released 6 years before the WG-5 GPS and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief view of how the 6000 scores vs the WG-5 GPS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus 6000 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 & Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus 6000 Gallery & Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
6000 | WG-5 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Olympus 6000
WG-5 GPS | 6000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2015 | July 2009 | Fresher by 68 months | |
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6000 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
6000 | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus 6000 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus 6000 has got external dimensions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has proportions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Look at the Olympus 6000 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at the time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the 6000 versus the WG-5 GPS.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the 6000 and WG-5 GPS is 94 and 90 respectively.
Olympus 6000 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizing only by going over specs. The photograph below might give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the 6000 and WG-5 GPS.
All in all, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The older 6000 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus 6000 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 6000 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
Also called as | mju Tough 6000 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2009-07-01 | 2015-02-10 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/4s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 14.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 179 grams (0.39 lb) | 236 grams (0.52 lb) |
Dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $259 | $500 |