Olympus 6000 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill
94 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28


83 Imaging
55 Features
33 Overall
46
Olympus 6000 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 6000
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Revealed February 2012
- Replaced the Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Later Model is Sigma DP3 Merrill

Olympus 6000 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Olympus 6000 and Sigma DP2 Merrill, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sigma. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the 6000 (10MP) and DP2 Merrill (15MP) and the 6000 (1/2.3") and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) enjoy different sensor size.

The 6000 was manufactured 3 years earlier than the DP2 Merrill and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 6000 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting in to a full comparison, below is a short introduction of how the 6000 matches up vs the DP2 Merrill when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus 6000 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 and Sigma DP2 Merrill. The entire galleries are available at Olympus 6000 Gallery and Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
6000 | DP2 Merrill |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Olympus 6000
DP2 Merrill | 6000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2012 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 31 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6000 and Sigma DP2 Merrill
6000 | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 6000 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 6000 enjoys outer measurements of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2 Merrill has dimensions of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") accompanied by a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Check out the Olympus 6000 and Sigma DP2 Merrill in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the 6000 and the DP2 Merrill.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the 6000 and DP2 Merrill is 94 and 83 respectively.

Olympus 6000 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to picture the difference between sensor measurements purely by reading a spec sheet. The photograph here will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the 6000 and DP2 Merrill.
Clearly, both cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The 6000 due to its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Sigma DP2 Merrill will offer you greater detail due to its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The older 6000 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Olympus 6000 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 6000 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | Sigma DP2 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sigma |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | Sigma DP2 Merrill |
Otherwise known as | mju Tough 6000 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2009-07-01 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 15MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4704 x 3136 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 50mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 2cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 4.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640x480 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 179g (0.39 pounds) | 330g (0.73 pounds) |
Dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $259 | $931 |