Olympus 6000 vs Sony HX99
94 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
91 Imaging
45 Features
67 Overall
53
Olympus 6000 vs Sony HX99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 6000
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3-inch Sensor
- 3.00" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.4) lens
- 242g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Announced September 2018
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus 6000 vs Sony HX99 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Olympus 6000 and Sony HX99, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the 6000 (10MP) and HX99 (18MP) and the 6000 (1/2.3") and HX99 (1/2.3-inch) provide different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe 6000 was introduced 10 years before the HX99 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the 6000 matches up vs the HX99 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus 6000 vs Sony HX99 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus 6000 Gallery & Sony HX99 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Sony HX99
| 6000 | HX99 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX99 over the Olympus 6000
| HX99 | 6000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2018 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 111 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimensions | 3.00" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 6000 and Sony HX99
| 6000 | HX99 |
|---|
Olympus 6000 vs Sony HX99 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus 6000 has got physical dimensions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Sony HX99 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") and a weight of 242 grams (0.53 lbs).
See the Olympus 6000 and Sony HX99 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the 6000 against the HX99.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the 6000 and HX99 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Olympus 6000 vs Sony HX99 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizes only by checking specs. The pic below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the 6000 and HX99.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The 6000 having a larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Sony HX99 will resolve extra detail using its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged 6000 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus 6000 vs Sony HX99 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus 6000 vs Sony HX99 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 |
| Also called | mju Tough 6000 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2009-07-01 | 2018-09-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3-inch |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-6.4 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3.00" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 638 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.5x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/4s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 5.40 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, flash on, slow sync, flash off, rear sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p, 120p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 179g (0.39 pounds) | 242g (0.53 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 360 shots |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $259 | $469 |