Olympus 6010 vs Samsung ST150F
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
![Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 front Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/angled/Olympus_Stylus_Tough_6010_1.jpg)
![Samsung ST150F front Samsung ST150F front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-ST150F/Samsung-ST150F-front.jpg)
96 Imaging
40 Features
30 Overall
36
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung ST150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Also referred to as mju Tough 6010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 114g - 94 x 58 x 18mm
- Revealed January 2013
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung ST150F Overview
Below is a extensive review of the Olympus 6010 vs Samsung ST150F, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the 6010 (12MP) and ST150F (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
The 6010 was revealed 4 years prior to the ST150F and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the 6010 matches up versus the ST150F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung ST150F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 & Samsung ST150F. The full galleries are available at Olympus 6010 Gallery & Samsung ST150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6010 over the Samsung ST150F
6010 | ST150F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung ST150F over the Olympus 6010
ST150F | 6010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 42 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus 6010 and Samsung ST150F
6010 | ST150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung ST150F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus 6010 features external measurements of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Samsung ST150F has proportions of 94mm x 58mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 114 grams (0.25 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 6010 vs Samsung ST150F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the 6010 and the ST150F.
![Olympus 6010 vs Samsung ST150F size comparison Olympus 6010 vs Samsung ST150F size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-Stylus-Tough-6010-vs-Samsung-ST150F-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 6010 and ST150F is 94 and 96 respectively.
![Olympus 6010 vs Samsung ST150F top view buttons comparison Olympus 6010 vs Samsung ST150F top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-Stylus-Tough-6010-vs-Samsung-ST150F-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung ST150F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to picture the gap between sensor measurements simply by checking specifications. The photograph underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the 6010 and ST150F.
To sum up, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can expect the Samsung ST150F to give you more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures more aggressively. The older 6010 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
![Olympus 6010 vs Samsung ST150F sensor size comparison Olympus 6010 vs Samsung ST150F sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-Stylus-Tough-6010-vs-Samsung-ST150F-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung ST150F Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus 6010 vs Samsung ST150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus 6010 vs Samsung ST150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-Stylus-Tough-6010-vs-Samsung-ST150F-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung ST150F Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Samsung ST150F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Samsung ST150F |
Also referred to as | mju Tough 6010 | - |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-07-17 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.5-6.3 |
Macro focus range | 2cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/4s | 1s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 179 gr (0.39 pounds) | 114 gr (0.25 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 94 x 58 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | LI-50C | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $0 | $300 |