Olympus 6010 vs Sigma SD9
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
Olympus 6010 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 6010
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Announced November 2002
- Successor is Sigma SD10
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus 6010 vs Sigma SD9 Overview
Here is a comprehensive overview of the Olympus 6010 vs Sigma SD9, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sigma. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the 6010 (12MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the 6010 (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) possess different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe 6010 was announced 6 years later than the SD9 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 6010 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the 6010 grades vs the SD9 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 6010 vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 and Sigma SD9. The whole galleries are available at Olympus 6010 Gallery and Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6010 over the Sigma SD9
| 6010 | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2009 | November 2002 | Fresher by 81 months | |
| Display dimension | 2.7" | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 130k | Sharper display (+100k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Olympus 6010
| SD9 | 6010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus 6010 and Sigma SD9
| 6010 | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus 6010 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera often, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 6010 has physical measurements of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Sigma SD9 has dimensions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") and a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Check the Olympus 6010 vs Sigma SD9 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the 6010 versus the SD9.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the 6010 and SD9 is 94 and 54 respectively.
Olympus 6010 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizing only by reading technical specs. The visual here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the 6010 and SD9.
As you can tell, both the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The 6010 having a tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh harder and the Olympus 6010 will offer extra detail with its extra 9MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos much more aggressively. The more modern 6010 provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus 6010 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus 6010 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Sigma SD9 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Sigma SD9 |
| Also Known as | mju Tough 6010 | - |
| Type | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Revealed | 2009-07-17 | 2002-11-26 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 3 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 1.8 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 130k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 179 grams (0.39 pounds) | 950 grams (2.09 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LI-50C | - |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $0 | $3,001 |