Olympus 6010 vs Sigma Quattro
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
63 Imaging
68 Features
56 Overall
63
Olympus 6010 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 6010
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Announced February 2016
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus 6010 vs Sigma Quattro Overview
The following is a thorough assessment of the Olympus 6010 and Sigma Quattro, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Sigma. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the 6010 (12MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the 6010 (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) posses totally different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe 6010 was announced 7 years prior to the Quattro which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 6010 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the 6010 scores vs the Quattro with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus 6010 vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 & Sigma sd Quattro. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus 6010 Gallery & Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6010 over the Sigma Quattro
| 6010 | Quattro |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Olympus 6010
| Quattro | 6010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2016 | July 2009 | Newer by 80 months | |
| Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 1620k | 230k | Sharper screen (+1390k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6010 and Sigma Quattro
| 6010 | Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus 6010 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 6010 has physical dimensions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Sigma Quattro has dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus 6010 and Sigma Quattro in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the 6010 versus the Quattro.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 6010 and Quattro is 94 and 63 respectively.
Olympus 6010 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions just by looking through specifications. The image here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the 6010 and Quattro.
To sum up, both of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The 6010 with its smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Sigma Quattro will result in greater detail with its extra 17 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged 6010 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus 6010 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus 6010 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Sigma sd Quattro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Sigma sd Quattro |
| Otherwise known as | mju Tough 6010 | - |
| Class | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Released | 2009-07-17 | 2016-02-23 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | Dual TRUE III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 29 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5424 x 3616 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 76 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 1,620k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.8 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | - | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | - |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 179 grams (0.39 lb) | 625 grams (1.38 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | LI-50C | BP-61 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $738 |