Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic GF1
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f83bd/f83bdf39352a979ef5fa8b296f80d35d80574119" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab3e2/ab3e2b95d505b4b0ff0bfe0dc0d284b98f4a2d41" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 front"
85 Imaging
47 Features
47 Overall
47
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic GF1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 385g - 119 x 71 x 36mm
- Revealed October 2009
- New Model is Panasonic GF2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic GF1 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Olympus 6020 and Panasonic GF1, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the 6020 (13MP) and the GF1 (12MP) is pretty well matched but the 6020 (1/2.3") and GF1 (Four Thirds) offer different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The 6020 was manufactured 4 months later than the GF1 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic GF1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the 6020 matches up against the GF1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic GF1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus 6020 Gallery and Panasonic GF1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Panasonic GF1
6020 | GF1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic GF1 over the Olympus 6020
GF1 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Panasonic GF1
6020 | GF1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2010 | ![]() | October 2009 | Similar generation |
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic GF1 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus 6020 has exterior dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Panasonic GF1 has proportions of 119mm x 71mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4") with a weight of 385 grams (0.85 lbs).
Look at the Olympus 6020 and Panasonic GF1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is a front view size comparison of the 6020 compared to the GF1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c9f3/3c9f30084ff1927a8597c992ccee1993caff3aa4" alt="Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic GF1 size comparison Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic GF1 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 6020 and GF1 is 95 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1781b/1781b4dea67a02e7c99c554022f990dbeb20868e" alt="Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic GF1 top view buttons comparison Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic GF1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic GF1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to visualize the gap between sensor measurements purely by checking technical specs. The graphic below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the 6020 and GF1.
As you have seen, both of those cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The 6020 due to its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh tougher and the Olympus 6020 will give you extra detail due to its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d414/0d414e92a17a73755b0e766b31e258474b883357" alt="Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic GF1 sensor size comparison Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic GF1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic GF1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca2f5/ca2f55c1b6e147e766389ad26f06628c0018c6a6" alt="Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic GF1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic GF1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic GF1 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 |
Also called as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2010-02-02 | 2009-10-14 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | Venus Engine HD |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 6.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | AVCHD Lite |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 122 gr (0.27 pounds) | 385 gr (0.85 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 119 x 71 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 54 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 513 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 380 pictures |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/MMC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $279 | $400 |