Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic GH1
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
81 Imaging
49 Features
57 Overall
52
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic GH1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Released February 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 385g - 124 x 90 x 45mm
- Released July 2009
- Replacement is Panasonic GH2
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic GH1 Overview
Here, we are matching up the Olympus 6020 and Panasonic GH1, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the 6020 (13MP) and the GH1 (12MP) is fairly similar but the 6020 (1/2.3") and GH1 (Four Thirds) boast totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe 6020 was unveiled 7 months after the GH1 and they are of a similar age. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic GH1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a short summary of how the 6020 grades vs the GH1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic GH1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH1. The full galleries are provided at Olympus 6020 Gallery & Panasonic GH1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Panasonic GH1
| 6020 | GH1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2010 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic GH1 over the Olympus 6020
| GH1 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Panasonic GH1
| 6020 | GH1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display |  | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic GH1 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus 6020 enjoys external dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Panasonic GH1 has measurements of 124mm x 90mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.5" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 385 grams (0.85 lbs).
See the Olympus 6020 and Panasonic GH1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the 6020 versus the GH1.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the 6020 and GH1 is 95 and 81 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic GH1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reviewing technical specs. The image below will give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the 6020 and GH1.
As you have seen, both of those cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The 6020 having a tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Olympus 6020 will offer more detail having an extra 1MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more recent 6020 will have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic GH1 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic GH1 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH1 |
| Also called as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
| Type | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Released | 2010-02-02 | 2009-07-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine HD |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 18.89 x 14.48mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 273.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 60 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 10.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 122g (0.27 lbs) | 385g (0.85 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 124 x 90 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.5" x 1.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 64 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.6 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 772 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 320 photographs |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $279 | $949 |