Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh CX4
Portability
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Portability
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
Olympus 6020
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched February 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 6020
Ricoh CX4
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched August 2010
Photography Glossary Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus 6020 versus Ricoh CX4, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the 6020 (13MP) and CX4 (10MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe 6020 was brought out 6 months before the CX4 and they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple summation of how the 6020 matches up vs the CX4 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 and Ricoh CX4. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus 6020 Gallery and Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Ricoh CX4
| 6020 | CX4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Olympus 6020
| CX4 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Ricoh CX4
| 6020 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2010 |  | August 2010 | Same generation |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus 6020 has got exterior dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX4 has sizing of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus 6020 versus Ricoh CX4 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the 6020 and the CX4.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the 6020 and CX4 is 95 and 92 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to envision the gap in sensor dimensions just by seeing a spec sheet. The picture here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the 6020 and CX4.
Clearly, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Olympus 6020 to provide more detail having its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively.
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Olympus 6020
Portrait photography with Ricoh CX4
sensor resolution is decent (13MP)
manual focus not available
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
you can focus manually
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Street photography with Olympus 6020
Street photography with Ricoh CX4
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
lighter than average (122g)
screen is fixed
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (205 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Olympus 6020 Sports photography features
Ricoh CX4 Sports photography features
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (13MP)
features tracking focus
environment proofing
continuous shooting slow (5.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
max fps low (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Olympus 6020 Travel photography factors
Ricoh CX4 Travel photography factors
lighter than average (122g)
environment proofing
sensor resolution is decent (13MP)
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
lighter than competition in class (205 grams)
built-in flash
quite wide (28mm)
long reach (300mm)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Olympus 6020 Landscape photography advice
Ricoh CX4 Landscape photography advice
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (13MP)
environment proofing
manual focus not available
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
small screen (2.7 inch)
no manual control
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
lack of Time Lapse recording
you can focus manually
quite wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not available
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Olympus 6020 Vlogging information
Ricoh CX4 Vlogging information
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (122 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of mic socket
quite wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (205g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external mic socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Ricoh CX4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Ricoh CX4 |
| Also called as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-02-02 | 2010-08-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 122g (0.27 lb) | 205g (0.45 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | Li-50B | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $279 | $211 |