Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh CX5
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f83bd/f83bdf39352a979ef5fa8b296f80d35d80574119" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68076/68076f64aea446dc770a37f6b8beaf83f554abcb" alt="Ricoh CX5 front Ricoh CX5 front"
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh CX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Released February 2010
- Also referred to as mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh CX5 Overview
Below is a in depth overview of the Olympus 6020 and Ricoh CX5, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the 6020 (13MP) and CX5 (10MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The 6020 was introduced 17 months before the CX5 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple overview of how the 6020 matches up versus the CX5 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh CX5 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 & Ricoh CX5. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus 6020 Gallery & Ricoh CX5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Ricoh CX5
6020 | CX5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Olympus 6020
CX5 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2011 | ![]() | February 2010 | More recent by 17 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Ricoh CX5
6020 | CX5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh CX5 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus 6020 features external dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX5 has proportions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 6020 and Ricoh CX5 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the 6020 versus the CX5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84e45/84e45c64ea1ba5aecffd5837d2502e81583dc679" alt="Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh CX5 size comparison Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh CX5 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 6020 and CX5 is 95 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9856e/9856effea79cd366574babbb6af0c05a89f6a3f4" alt="Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh CX5 top view buttons comparison Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh CX5 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh CX5 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to envision the difference in sensor measurements purely by checking out specifications. The graphic underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the 6020 and CX5.
To sum up, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Olympus 6020 to produce greater detail using its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older 6020 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/170a5/170a5faa7ea4911a379ec89639563998e4381bb1" alt="Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh CX5 sensor size comparison Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh CX5 sensor size comparison"
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh CX5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f63ab/f63aba19be89517a5a9c795f14e280785af71c8a" alt="Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh CX5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh CX5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh CX5 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Ricoh CX5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Ricoh CX5 |
Also Known as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2010-02-02 | 2011-07-19 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 122g (0.27 lbs) | 205g (0.45 lbs) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | Li-50B | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $279 | $399 |