Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33


88 Imaging
52 Features
37 Overall
46
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Introduced September 2010

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Overview
Here is a complete overview of the Olympus 6020 versus Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the 6020 (13MP) and the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) is relatively well matched but the 6020 (1/2.3") and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) come with different sensor measurements.

The 6020 was announced 7 months prior to the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the 6020 grades against the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 & Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5. The whole galleries are available at Olympus 6020 Gallery & Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
6020 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Olympus 6020
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2010 | ![]() | February 2010 | Fresher by 7 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
6020 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus 6020 has outer measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has measurements of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") having a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Look at the Olympus 6020 versus Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the 6020 against the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the 6020 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 is 95 and 88 respectively.

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to picture the gap between sensor sizing purely by checking specs. The graphic below might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the 6020 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
All in all, both of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The 6020 using its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Olympus 6020 will resolve greater detail with its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The older 6020 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 6020 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
Also Known as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Class | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2010-02-02 | 2010-09-21 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | GR Engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 180 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/3200 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 122 gr (0.27 pounds) | 140 gr (0.31 pounds) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $279 | $566 |